Three models of technology-integrated mathematics teaching knowledge: a comparative analysis and implications for practical application in mathematics education in Vietnam
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the context of educational digital transformation, identifying the essential knowledge required for teachers to effectively teach mathematics with technological support has become increasingly important. This article compares three influential models of technology-integrated mathematical teaching knowledge - TPACK (Mishra & Koehler, 2006, 2019), PTK (Thomas & Hong, 2013), and KTMT (Rocha, 2013, 2022)—and analyzes their applicability to mathematics teaching practices in Vietnam. A narrative review combined with content analysis was employed to describe the theoretical structures of the three models and to contrast them using four core criteria: (i) knowledge domains, (ii) non-knowledge factors, (iii) knowledge development processes, and (iv) representational forms of the models. The findings show that each model embodies a distinct conceptualization of technology-integrated mathematics teaching knowledge. TPACK offers a highly generalizable and accessible framework suitable for foundational teacher education programs. KTMT presents a layered and context-sensitive knowledge structure, making it well-suited for curriculum development, competency frameworks, and educational policy. PTK highlights instrumental genesis and classroom-based professional practice, making it particularly valuable for school-based professional development and practice-oriented research. Based on the comparative analysis, the study proposes several directions for applying the three models in teacher preparation and professional development in Vietnam. It also suggests future research avenues, including the development of assessment scales, the design of professional development programs, and the implementation of intervention studies aimed at enhancing teachers’ capacity to teach mathematics with technology in the digital transformation era.
Keywords
Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics with Technology (KTMT), mathematics education, Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK), Pedagogical Technology Knowledge (PTK), technology, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Ball, D. L., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews in IS. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.26
Dick, T. (2008). Keeping the faith: Fidelity in technological tools for mathematics education. In G. Blume & M. Heid (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Cases and perspectives (pp. 333-340). IAP, NCTM.
Dunham, P. (2000). Hand-held calculators in mathematics education: A research perspective. In E. Laughbaum (Ed.), Hand-held technology in mathematics and science education: A collection of papers (pp. 39-47). Ohio State University.
Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001
Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230-235. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329
Forster, P. A. (2006). Assessing technology-based approaches for teaching and learning mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 145-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390500285826.
Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowl- edge and learning activity types. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536.
Kadluba, A., & Obersteiner, A. (2024). How to Assess Mathematics Teachers’ TPACK? A Comparison Between Self-Reports and Knowledge Tests. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(3), 663-688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10490-2
Lê, V. M. T., Dương, H. T., & Nguyễn, T. T. T. (2024). Teaching through experience with the support of GeoGebra: A case study of teaching the content "Volume of a rectangular prism" (Mathematics 5). Vietnam Journal of Education, 24(20), 24-29. https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/2495
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE
Mishra, P. (2019). Considering contextual knowledge: The TPACK diagram gets an upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 76-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019. 1588611
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Nguyễn, L. V. N. (2024). Ứng dụng công nghệ thông tin trong hoạt động dạy và học trực tuyến ở các truờng đại học trong bối cảnh mới. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Đồng Tháp, 13(01S), 323-330. https://doi.org/10.52714/dthu.13.01S.2024.1325
Peach, R., Haines, C., & Wake, G. (2023). Conceptualising mathematics teachers’ knowledge for technology-rich environments: A systematic synthesis. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35, 879–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-022-00451-4
Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies, approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Armand Colin.
Rocha, H. (2013). Knowledge for teaching mathematics with technology - A new framework of teacher knowledge. In A. Lindmeier & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th PME (Vol. 4, pp. 105-112). PME.
Rocha, H. (2022). Pre-service Teachers’ Knowledge and the Use of Different Technologies to Teach Mathematics. In: Mesquita, A., Abreu, A., Carvalho, J.V. (eds) Perspectives and Trends in Education and Technology. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (vol. 256, pp. 505-515), Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5063-5_42
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Tabach, M., & Trgalová, J. (2019). Technology in mathematics teaching: Recent trends and new challenges. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51, 869–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01075-3
Tabach, M., & Trgalová, J. (2019). The knowledge and skills that mathematics teachers need for ICT integration: The issue of standards. In G. Aldon & J. Trgalová (Eds.), Technology in mathematics teaching (pp. 183-203). Springer.
Tăng , M. D. (2022). Training pre-service teachers to teach mathematics with information technology: a view from the TPACK framework. HCMUE Journal of Science, 19(2), 201-212. https://doi.org/10.54607/hcmue.js.19.2.3328(2022)
Thomas, M., & Hong, Y. (2013). Teacher integration of technology into mathematics learning. International Journal of Technology in Mathematics Education, 20(2), 69-84.
Zbiek, R., Heid, M. K., Blume, G., & Dick, T. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education: A perspective of constructs. In F. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1169-1207). NCTM, IAP.