Enhancing Business Communication Proficiency among ESL Undergraduates through Project-based Learning: A Mixed-methods Inquiry

Nguyen Thi Dung Hue1,
1 Faculty of Business English, Foreign Trade University, Vietnam

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

Effective business communication in English has become essential for university graduates in English as a second language contexts as global workplace demands grow. This study examined the integration of project-based learning into a 15-week Business Communication course at Foreign Trade University, Vietnam, addressing three research questions: (a) whether students’ business communication proficiency improved through project-based learning, (b) how students perceived the learning process, and (c) what challenges the instructor faced during implementation. Participants were 60 third-year undergraduates majoring in Business English, organized into 12 teams of five. Using a convergent mixed methods design, the study collected four data types: pre- and post-course rubric-based performance assessments in three skill areas (business writing, oral presentation, negotiation); a 30-item Likert-scale questionnaire (n=60); three focus group interviews with 22 student volunteers; and a semi-structured interview with the course instructor, supported by classroom field notes. Quantitative analyses revealed statistically significant within-subjects gains across all three skills (Cohen’s d z = 1.36-1.61, p < 0.001). Questionnaire data indicated broadly positive student perceptions, with 82-89% agreement across the six measured dimensions. Focus group data converged on four themes: increased ownership, real-world language use, interpersonal-skill development, and a time-bounded period of initial uncertainty. The instructor reported greater student engagement and interaction than in previous teacher-led semesters, alongside substantial scaffolding demands during early project phases. The findings provide empirical support for project-based learning as a contextually relevant approach for advancing business English proficiency in TESOL programs at internationally oriented Vietnamese universities.

Chi tiết bài viết

Tài liệu tham khảo

Almulla, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of the project-based learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. SAGE Open, 10(3), 2158244020938702. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford University Press.
Beckett, G. H., & Slater, T. (Eds.). (2020). Global perspectives on project-based language learning, teaching, and assessment: Key approaches, technology tools, and frameworks. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429430725
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cahyono, B. Y., Irawati, R., Amalia, S. N., & Hidayat, L. E. (2024). Project-based learning in EFL educational settings: A meta-analysis study in EFL/ESL writing. Journal of Writing Research, 16(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2024.16.01.04
Chaney, L. H., & Martin, J. S. (2014). Intercultural business communication (6th ed.). Pearson.
Chen, C.-H., & Yang, Y.-C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26, 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001
Condliffe, B., Quint, J., Visher, M. G., Bangser, M. R., Drohojowska, S., Saco, L., & Nelson, E. (2017). Project-based learning: A literature review. MDRC. https://www.mdrc.org/publication/project-based-learning
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
Deveci, T., & Nunn, R. (2018). COMM151: A project-based course to enhance engineering students’ communication skills. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 6(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1801027D
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Ellis, R. (2018). Reflections on task-based language teaching. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788920148
Guffey, M. E., & Loewy, D. (2018). Business communication: Process and product (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Kankaanranta, A., & Louhiala-Salminen, L. (2018). ELF in the domain of business—BELF: What does the B stand for? In J. Jenkins, W. Baker, & M. Dewey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English as a lingua franca (pp. 309-320). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717173-25
Kilpatrick, W. H. (1918). The project method. Teachers College Record, 19(4), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811801900404
Knight, K. (2016). Project-based learning for business English learners. TESOL Journal, 7(4), 875-901. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.244
Langen, I., & Stamov Roßnagel, C. (2023). East is East: Socratic classroom communication is linked to higher stress in students from Confucian heritage cultures. Heliyon, 9(5), e15748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15748
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J. R., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project-based learning: A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. ASCD.
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018). Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51(3), 285–329. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000125
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ngereja, B., Hussein, B., & Andersen, B. (2020). Does project-based learning (PBL) promote student learning? A performance evaluation. Education Sciences, 10(11), 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110330
Nguyen, T. T., & Balakrishnan, T. (2019). Challenges of implementing project-based learning in Vietnamese EFL classrooms. Journal of Language and Education, 5(2), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2019.8691
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford University Press.
Tran, L. T. (2020). The growth of English-medium instruction in Vietnamese higher education: Policy and practice. Asian Education and Development Studies, 9(4), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-09-2019-0071
Tran, T. Q., & Tran, T. N. P. (2020). Attitudes toward the use of project-based learning: A case study of Vietnamese high school students. Journal of Language and Education, 6(3), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.10109
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 10(1), 2158244019900176. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.