Explainable machine learning analysis of electrical conductivity in graphene–polymer composites

Quách Khả Quang1, , Lê Thị Ngọc Tú2, Trương Thị Bạch Yến2, Trần Thị Thanh Thư2
1 Dong Thap University, Cao Lanh, Dong Thap Province, Vietnam
2 Faculty of Natural Science Education, Dong Thap University, Vietnam

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

Electrical conductivity in graphene–polymer composites varies over many orders of magnitude because conductive pathways form only when graphene flakes become sufficiently connected. This study analyzes a literature-derived dataset of 486 graphene–polymer composite samples using Random Forest and Gradient Boosting models. The input descriptors were polymer matrix, filler type, processing route, system classification, and graphene loading. The conductivity target was expressed as log10 (s) to reduce its wide dynamic range. On the fixed test split, Gradient Boosting achieved the best performance, with R2=0.91, RMSE=1.36, and MAE=0.93 in log10 (sspace, compared with R2=0.84, RMSE=1.77 and MAE=1.45 for Random Forest. The results indicate that graphene loading alone does not explain conductivity variation across heterogeneous systems. Grouped feature-importance analysis showed that graphene loading (34.1%), system classification (32.6%), and processing route (20.8%) had the largest relative contributions to the model predictions, whereas polymer matrix (9.1%) and filler type (3.2%) showed lower grouped importance. These percentages represent model-based relative importance rather than causal physical contributions. Microstructural descriptors, including graphene aspect ratio, dispersion quality, and agglomeration state, were not consistently reported in the source literature and therefore, they were not included among the five model inputs; their absence remains an important source of predictive uncertainty. Overall, interpretable machine learning provides a useful framework for analysing conductivity trends in literature-derived datasets while making explicit the limitations of the available data.

Chi tiết bài viết

Tài liệu tham khảo

Gupta, K. K., Barman, S., Sankar, A., Dey, S., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (2026). Artificial intelligence in materials by design: Critical review and perspectives on materials informatics to generative and agentic intelligence. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-025-10486-3
He, L., & Tjong, S. C. (2013). Low percolation threshold of graphene/polymer composites prepared by solvothermal reduction of graphene oxide in the polymer solution. Nanoscale Research Letters, 8, 132. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-8-132
Kim, H., Abdala, A. A., & Macosko, C. W. (2010). Graphene/polymer nanocomposites. Macromolecules, 43(16), 6515–6530. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma100572e
Kuilla, T., Bhadra, S., Yao, D., Kim, N. H., Bose, S., & Lee, J. H. (2010). Recent advances in graphene-based polymer composites. Progress in Polymer Science, 35(11), 1350–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.005
Ladani, R. B., Wu, S., Kinloch, A. J., Ghorbani, K., Zhang, J., Mouritz, A. P., & Wang, C. H. (2015). Improving the toughness and electrical conductivity of epoxy nanocomposites by using aligned carbon nanofibres. Composites Science and Technology, 117, 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.07.001
Milad, A., Hussein, S. H., Khekan, A. R., Rashid, M., Al-Msari, H., & Tran, T. H. (2022). Development of ensemble machine learning approaches for designing fiber-reinforced polymer composite strain prediction models. Engineering with Computers, 38(4), 3625–3637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01398-4
Raza, Y., Raza, H., Ahmed, A., Quazi, M. M., Jamshaid, M., Anwar, M. T., Bashir, M. N., Younas, T., & Jafry, A. T. (2025). Integration of response surface methodology (RSM), machine learning (ML), and artificial intelligence (AI) for enhancing properties of polymeric nanocomposites—A review. Polymer Composites, 46(15):13591-13627. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.30011
Sahimi, M. (1996). Linear and nonlinear, scalar and vector transport processes in heterogeneous media: Fractals, percolation, and scaling laws. Chemical Engineering Journal, 64(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-0467(96)03103-X
Stauffer, D., & Aharony, A. (1992). Introduction to percolation theory (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315274386
Sun, Z., Liu, Y., Wong, R., Yu, M., Li, J., Moran, M., … & Wong, C. P. (2022). Crumpled graphene epoxy nanocomposites modified with polydopamine for advanced semiconductor packaging applications. Composites Science and Technology, 230, 109709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109709
Tarhini, A., & Tehrani-Bagha, A. R. (2023). Advances in preparation methods and conductivity properties of graphene-based polymer composites. Applied Composite Materials, 30, 1737–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-023-10145-5
Zare, Y., Munir, M. T., & Rhee, K. Y. (2024). Assessment of electrical conductivity of polymer nanocomposites containing a deficient interphase around graphene nanosheet. Scientific Reports, 14, 8737. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59678-0

Các bài báo được đọc nhiều nhất của cùng tác giả

<< < 1 2