Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 25/12/2019
Online Published: 25/12/2019
Abstract Views: 37
Views PDF: 77
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52714/dthu.41.12.2019.746
Issue
No. 41 (2019): Part A - Social Sciences and Humanities
Section
Social Sciences and Humanities Issue (Vietnamese)
How to Cite
Vo, V. M. N., Le, T. X. A., Nguyen, D. K., & Le, T. H. (2019). The level of understanding and perspectives on the scholarly metrics of faculty and researchers at Can Tho University. Dong Thap University Journal of Science, 41, 26-32. https://doi.org/10.52714/dthu.41.12.2019.746

The level of understanding and perspectives on the scholarly metrics of faculty and researchers at Can Tho University

Van May Nam Vo1, Thi Xuan An Le1, Dang Khoa Nguyen1, Trong Hieu Le1
1 Can Tho University

Main Article Content

Abstract

An online survey among 153 participants of faculty and researchers was conducted in various specialized fields, different qualifications and experiences to explore their levels of understanding and perspectives on scholarly metrics at Can Tho University. The obtained results indicated that most researchers understand how to use academic indicators in research. In addition, the majority of the participants agreed that Can Tho University should monitor staff's scholarly metrics. However, there is an inequality in the understanding level of academic indicators among the participants. Thereupon, this study has made recommendations for improvement.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Keywords

Can Tho University, faculty, researchers, scholarly metric

References

[1]. Dan DeSanto and Aaron Nichols (2017), "Scholarly metrics baseline: A survey of faculty knowledge, use, and opinion about scholarly metrics", College & Research Libraries, (Volume 2(78)), p. 150-170.
[2]. Khuất Đăng Long (2012), "Về hệ số tác động của tạp chí, chỉ số trích dẫn và chất lượng của một bài báo khoa học", Tạp chí Sinh học, (Số 3(34)), tr. 265-274.
[3]. Mindy Thuna and Pam King (2017), "Research impact metrics: A faculty perspective", Partnership: The canadian journal of library and information practice and research, 12(1), https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v12i1.3906, retrieved 25/09/2019. [4]. Tạ Cao Minh (2012), "Bài báo khoa học, ISI và một số “thước đo” đánh giá nhà khoa học", Tự động hóa ngày nay, (Số 134), tr. 18-23.
[5]. Nguyễn Văn Tuấn (2015), Đi vào NCKH, NXB Tổng hợp Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.
[6]. Trường ĐHCT (2019), Báo cáo thường niên 2018, Trường ĐHCT, Cần Thơ.