Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 11/12/2018
Online Published: 23/06/2023
Abstract Views: 258
Views PDF: 231
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52714/dthu.35.12.2018.638
Issue
No. 35 (2018): Part A - Social Sciences and Humanities
Section
Social Sciences and Humanities Issue (Vietnamese)
How to Cite
Nguyen, T. T. D., Tran, T. A., & Nguyen, T. A. M. (2023). Factors influencing intention to use Web 2.0 technologies of English Pedagogic students in Dalat University to supplement teaching. Dong Thap University Journal of Science, 35, 3-9. https://doi.org/10.52714/dthu.35.12.2018.638

Factors influencing intention to use Web 2.0 technologies of English Pedagogic students in Dalat University to supplement teaching

Thi Thuy Dung Nguyen1, , Tam Ai Tran2, Thi Anh Minh Nguyen2
1 Da Lat University
2 DaLat University

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigated factors influencing the intention of English pedagogic students, Dalat University to use Web 2.0 technologies in teaching. Data were assembled via a survey questionnaire, and analyzed with descriptive, regressive and reasoned statistics based on the framework of the Decomposed theory of planned behavior [8]. Results revealed that the attitude, subjective norm and behavior control perception are three major factors strongly impacting students’ intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies in their teaching. Although the majority of students intended to apply Web 2.0 technologies for potentially multilateral benefits, they are somehow worried about dealing with certain obstacles such as facilities and users in practice.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Keywords

Technologies Web 2.0, English pedagogic students, student

References

[1]. Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2009), “Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests”, The Internet and Higher Education, (No 11), p. 71-80.
[2]. Dohn, N.B. (2009), “Web 2.0-Mediated Competence - Implicit Educational Demands on Learners”, Electronic Journal of e-Learning, (No 7), p. 111 - 118.
[3]. Lei, J. (2009), “Digital natives as preservice teachers: What technology preparation is needed?”, Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, (No 25), p. 87-97.
[4]. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994), “Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd edition)”, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, London.
[5]. Nelson, J., Christopher, A., & Mims, C. (2009), “TPACK and web 2.0: Transformation of teaching and learning”, Tech Trends, (No 53), p. 80-85.
[6]. Oblinger, D. & Oblinger, J. L. & Lippincott, J. K. (2005), Educating the Net Generation. The College at Brockport: State University of New York, Brockport Bookshelf.
[7]. Shihab, M. (2008), Web 2.0 Tools Improve Teaching and Collaboration in High School English Language Classes, Luận án tiến sĩ, Trường Đại học Nova Southeastern, Florida.
[8]. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995), “The decomposed theory of planned behavior”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, No 12, p. 137-155.