Factors influencing problem-solving competence in STEM education: Gender-based insights from high school students in Quang Tri province
Nội dung chính của bài viết
Tóm tắt
The present study investigates the factors influencing problem-solving competence in STEM educational systems amongst 700 secondary school students in Quang Tri Province, taking into account gender inclusion. A self-administered survey with established validity was used to measure five distinct aspects: STEM Interest, STEM Self-Efficacy, Teacher Support, Peer Collaboration, and Access to Resources. Exploratory factor analysis and regression modeling indicated that problem-solving competence is significantly predicted by STEM Interest (β = 0.38, p < 0.001) and STEM Self-Efficacy (β = 0.31, p < 0.001), the two factors accounting for 52% of the variation in the dependent variable. Gender differences showed males reported more STEM Self-Efficacy (t = 3.21, p < 0.01), while females had more Teacher Support (t = -3.78, p < 0.001). Further regression showed that for males, the factor of STEM self-efficacy was predicted, while teacher support and peer collaboration were more predictive in females. Qualitative focus group data enriched these findings, revealing themes such as perceived biases, resource constraints, and the importance of collaborative environments. This supports creating different strategies in STEM education as there are variations based on gender. This implies that building self-efficacy in the female gender and constructing conducive, cooperative settings in the male gender would enhance problem-solving competence in both genders. This study investigates the practical aspects of responsive STEM education targeting gender equality in skill acquisition.
Từ khóa
Competence, gender, problem-solving, STEM.
Chi tiết bài viết
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Blackburn, J. (2024). Self-efficacy development of female secondary students in an Assistive Co-Robotics Project (Master's thesis, Purdue University).
Blotnicky, K. A., Franz-Odendaal, T., French, F., & Joy, P. (2018). A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 1-15.
Brown, P. L., Concannon, J. P., Marx, D., Donaldson, C., & Black, A. (2016). An examination of middle school students' STEM self-efficacy, interests and perceptions. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 17(3).
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
Cooper, R., & Heaverlo, C. (2013). Problem solving and creativity and design: What influence do they have on girls' interest in STEM subject areas?. American Journal of Engineering Education, 4(1), 27-38.
De las Cuevas, P., García-Arenas, M., & Rico, N. (2022). Why not STEM? A study case on the influence of gender factors on students’ higher education choice. Mathematics, 10(2), 239.
Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A. G., Campbell, P. B., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutiérrez, C. G.,... & Zavala, M. (2016). Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), es5.
Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127-146.
Halim, L., Mohd Shahali, E. H., & H Iksan, Z. (2023). Effect of environmental factors on students’ interest in STEM careers: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(4), 1394-1411.
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.
Iwuanyanwu, P. N. (2020). Nature of problem-solving skills for 21st century STEM learners: What teachers need to know. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 55(1), 4.
Jordan, M. E., & McDaniel Jr, R. R. (2014). Managing uncertainty during collaborative problem solving in elementary school teams: The role of peer influence in robotics engineering activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 490-536.
Kuchynka, S. L., Eaton, A., & Rivera, L. M. (2022). Understanding and addressing gender‐based inequities in STEM: Research synthesis and recommendations for US K‐12 education. Social issues and policy review, 16(1), 252-288.
LaForce, M., Noble, E., & Blackwell, C. (2017). Problem-based learning (PBL) and student interest in STEM careers: The roles of motivation and ability beliefs. Education Sciences, 7(4), 92.
Le, H. D., Anh, T. T. M., Hien, V. T. H., Van, L. T., & Mai, N. T. (2024). Analyzing determinants of long-rotation plantation decisions by local households in Quang Tri Province, Vietnam with Bayesian Networks. Land Use Policy, 138, 107029.
Liu, X. X., Gong, S. Y., Zhang, H. P., Yu, Q. L., & Zhou, Z. J. (2021). Perceived teacher support and creative self-efficacy: The mediating roles of autonomous motivation and achievement emotions in Chinese junior high school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100752.
Lodewyk, K. R., & Winne, P. H. (2005). Relations among the structure of learning tasks, achievement, and changes in self-efficacy in secondary students. Journal of educational psychology, 97(1), 3.
Machi, E. (2009). Improving US competitiveness with K-12 STEM education and training. Heritage Special Report. SR-57. A report on the STEM Education and National Security Conference, October 21-23, 2008. Heritage Foundation.
McDonald, C. V. (2016). STEM Education: A review of the contribution of the disciplines of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Science Education International, 27(4), 530-569.
Nord, W. A. (2014). Religion and American education: Rethinking a national dilemma. UNC Press Books.
Patrick, H., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Samarapungavan, A. (2009). Motivation for learning science in kindergarten: Is there a gender gap and does integrated inquiry and literacy instruction make a difference. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 166-191.
Ramsey, P. G. (2004). Teaching and learning in a diverse world: Multicultural education for young children (Vol. 93). Teachers College Press.
Rittmayer, A. D., & Beier, M. E. (2008). Overview: Self-efficacy in STEM. Swe-Awe Casee Overviews, 1(3), 12.
Sithole, A., Chiyaka, E. T., McCarthy, P., Mupinga, D. M., Bucklein, B. K., & Kibirige, J. (2017). Student attraction, persistence and retention in STEM programs: Successes and continuing challenges. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), 46-59.
Snyder, L. G., & Snyder, M. J. (2008). Teaching critical thinking and problem solving skills. The Journal of Research in Business Education, 50(2), 90.
Srinivasan, S. (2017). Persistence in STEM: Development of a persistence model integrating self-efficacy, outcome expectations and performance in Chemistry Gateway Courses (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee).
Syed, M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Chemers, M. M., Goza, B. K., Bearman, S., Crosby, F. J.,... & Morgan, E. M. (2019). The role of self‐efficacy and identity in mediating the effects of STEM support experiences. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 19(1), 7-49.
Tandrayen-Ragoobur, V., & Gokulsing, D. (2022). Gender gap in STEM education and career choices: what matters? Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(3), 1021-1040.
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 119-140.
Wegemer, C. M., & Eccles, J. S. (2019). Gendered STEM career choices: Altruistic values, beliefs, and identity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 28-42.
Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 215-246.
Zeldin, A. L., Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). A comparative study of the self‐efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science, and technology careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 1036-1058.
Các bài báo được đọc nhiều nhất của cùng tác giả
- Tran Thi Ngoc Anh, Hoang Thi Thuy Duong, Pham Thi My Hanh, Tran Thi Thanh Thu, Application of 5E model in Natural Science teaching to develop students' nature-understanding competence in junior high school , Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Đồng Tháp: Tập 12 Số 3 (2023): Chuyên san Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn (Tiếng Anh)
- Tran Thi Ngoc Anh, Designing and organizing STEM education: “Dry hand sanitizer” topic by model 5E in grade 11 organic chemistry , Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Đồng Tháp: Tập 11 Số 6 (2022): Chuyên san Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn (Tiếng Việt)
- Trần Thị Ngọc Ánh, Lý Minh Hùng, Đề xuất quy trình áp dụng mô hình 5E trong dạy học chủ đề "Ba định luật Newton về chuyển động" (Vật lí 10) theo hướng bồi dưỡng năng lực nhận thức vật lí của học sinh , Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Đồng Tháp: Tập 14 Số 4 (2025): Chuyên san Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn (Tiếng Việt)
- Trần Thị Ngọc Ánh, Trương Thanh Thuận, Quy trình xây dựng câu hỏi đánh giá năng lực vật lí trong dạy học "Mô tả chuyển động" Vật lí 10 theo cấu trúc định dạng đề thi tốt nghiệp trung học phổ thông từ năm 2025 , Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Đồng Tháp: Tập 14 Số 6 (2025): Chuyên san Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn (Tiếng Việt)