Some notes on using the term “toxic masculinity”
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article clarifies the term “toxic masculinity” in gender research. Synthesizing reputable academic journals on gender, men, and masculinities under the discourse analysis approach, the study identifies that “toxic masculinity” highlights the negative dimensions of “traditional masculinity”, which adversely impact men’s physical and mental health. However, the concept also presents certain limitations. First, “toxic masculinity” is sometimes identified with “traditional masculinity”, resulting in the denigration of men. At other times, it contradicts “natural masculinity”, thereby attributing the toxic elements solely to the influence of modern society. Second, the term is often employed to identify specific individuals, specially those on the margins of society, which personalizes gender inequality issues rather than framing them as systemic problems. The authors argue that when employing “toxic masculinity” as an analytical concept, it should not be used as a tool for accusing individuals. Instead, it should serve as a critical instrument to gender stereotypes.
Keywords
Gender inequality, gender stereotypes, “toxic masculinity”, “traditional masculinity”.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Bly, R. (2015). Iron John: A book about men: Hachette UK.
Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2 ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Courtenay, W. H. (2000). Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health. Social Science & Medicine, 50(10), 1385-1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00390-1.
Dinh, D. T., Pham, C. T. M., & Nguyen, A. V. H. (2022). Toxic masculinity in undergraduates measured with levant’s conformity to masculine norms inventory (CMNI) University of Social sciences and humanities. Trình bày tại Hội thảo The World in Crisis: The contribution of Psychology. Hanoi, Vietnam.
Everitt-Penhale, B., & Ratele, K. (2015). Rethinking ‘traditional masculinity’ as constructed, multiple, and ≠ hegemonic masculinity. South African Review of Sociology, 46(2), 4-22. doi:10.1080/21528586.2015.1025826
Ferguson, C. J. (2023). The American psychological Association's practice guidelines for men and boys: Are they hurting rather than helping male mental wellness? New Ideas in Psychology, 68, 100984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100984.
Harrington, C. (2020). What is “Toxic Masculinity” and Why Does it Matter? Men and Masculinities, 24(2), 345-352.
Hoang, T.-A., Quach, T. T., & Tran, T. T. (2013). 'Because I am a man, I should be gentle to my wife and my children': positive masculinity to stop gender-based violence in a coastal district in Vietnam. Gender and Development, 21(1), 81-96.
Iacoviello, V., Valsecchi, G., Berent, J., Borinca, I., & Falomir-Pichastor, J. M. (2022). Is traditional masculinity still valued? Men’s perceptions of how different reference groups value traditional masculinity norms. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 30(1), 7-27.
Khuất, T. H., Nguyễn, H. N. Q., Đỗ, T. T., & Nguyễn, T. V. A. (2021). Một số nghiên cứu xã hội học về nam giới và nam tính trên thế giới. Tạp chí Khoa học xã hội Việt Nam, 6, 72-73.
Kupers, T. A. (2005). Toxic masculinity as a barrier to mental health treatment in prison. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(6), 713-724. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20105.
Levant, R. F., & Richmond, K. (2008). A Review of Research on Masculinity Ideologies Using the Male Role Norms Inventory. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 15(2), 130-146.
Mahalik, J. R., Burns, S. M., & Syzdek, M. (2007). Masculinity and perceived normative health behaviors as predictors of men's health behaviors. Social Science & Medicine, 64(11), 2201-2209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.02.035.
McCann, H. (2022). Is there anything “toxic” about femininity? The rigid femininities that keep us locked in. Psychology & Sexuality, 13(1), 9-22.
Messerschmidt, J. W. (2018). Hegemonic Masculinity: Formulation, Reformulation, and Amplification. London, UK: Rowman and Littlefield.
O'Neil, J. M. (2008). Summarizing 25 years of research on men's gender role conflict using the Gender Role Conflict Scale: New research paradigms and clinical implications. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(3), 358-445.
Pappas, S. (2019). Continuing education apa issues first-ever guidelines for practice with men and boys. Monitor on Psychology, 35-39.
Phạm, Q. L., Lê, Q. B., Nguyễn, M. H., Lê, Q. M., Nguyễn L. N., & Trần, V. N. G. (2023), Bất bình đẳng giới tại nơi làm việc, Hà Nội: Nxb Phụ nữ Việt Nam.
Phạm, T. H. & Nguyễn, Đ. T. (2008), Nghiên cứu nam giới và nam tính ở phương Tây: Những khái niệm cơ bản. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Gia đình và giới, 18(2), 80-89.
Pilcher, J., & Whelehan, I. (2022). Khái niệm then chốt trong nghiên cứu giới (Nguyễn, T.M., Biên dịch), Hà Nội: Nxb Phụ nữ Việt Nam.
Rotundi, L. (2020). The Issue of Toxic Masculinity. Luiss Guido Carli, Libera Università Internazionale. Italia.
Sam de Boise, S. (2019). Editorial: is masculinity toxic?. NORMA, 14(3), 147-151.
Sculos, B. W. (2017). Who’s Afraid of ‘Toxic Masculinity’? Class, Race and Corporate Power, 5(3), 6.
Viện Nghiên cứu phát triển xã hội. (2020). Nam giới và nam tính trong một Việt Nam hội nhập – Những phát hiện chính từ cuộc nghiên cứu và ý nghĩa đối với bình đẳng giới. Hà Nội: NXB Phụ nữ Việt Nam.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Thi Thuy Linh Phan, Thi Thanh Nga Nguyen, Thi Viet Hoan Tran, Factors influencing destination choice to Hue City of tourists from Da Nang , Dong Thap University Journal of Science: Vol. 11 No. 6 (2022): Social Sciences and Humanities Issue (Vietnamese)