Comparative analysis of hybrid optimization algorithms combined artificial rabbits optimization and arctic puffin optimization

Hoang Minh Nhat Le1, Ngoc Vy Bach1, Thi Ly Phung1, Nguyen Trong Nghia Dinh1,
1 Department of Information Technology, Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade, VietNam

Main Article Content

Abstract

The paper delivers a breakthrough in the optimization field by combining two nature-inspired algorithms: Arctic Puffin Optimization (APO) and Artificial Rabbits Optimization (ARO). The research proposes five hybrid strategies, such as sequential, alternating, and parallel, to take advantage of the global exploration capability of APO and exploit the local efficiency of ARO. The hybrid strategies are evaluated by using six standard Benchmark funtions with different problem dimensions. The results show that the hybrid strategies, especially the alternating and parallel ones, outperform ARO and APO independently in terms of convergence speed, accuracy, and local extreme avoidance. This combination deploys the global exploration capabilities of APO and the local exploitation capabilities of ARO, providing effective solutions to multidimensional optimization problems. Future development direction focuses on automatic tuning of hybrid strategies and practical applications, such as route optimization or energy management.

Article Details

References

Abdel-Basset, M., Abdel-Fatah, L., & Sangaiah, A. K. (2018). Metaheuristic algorithms: A comprehensive review. In Sangaiah, A. K., Sheng, M. & Zhang, Z. (Editors), Computational Intelligence for Multimedia Big Data on the Cloud with Engineering Applications (185–231). Massachusetts: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813314-9.00010-4
Alorf, A. (2023). A survey of recently developed metaheuristics and their comparative analysis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 117(A), 105622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105622
Holland, J. H. (1992). Genetic Algorithms. Scientific American. Scientific American Magazine, 267(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0792-66
Jamil, M., & Yang, X.-S. (2013). A literature survey of benchmark functions for global optimization problems. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation, 4(2), 150–194. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1308.4008
Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (1995). Particle Swarm Optimization. In Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks, 4, 1942–1948. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968
Layeb, A. (2022). New hard benchmark functions for global optimization. arXiv - Neural and Evolutionary Computing, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.04606
Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Lewis, A. (2014). Grey Wolf optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 69, 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007
Tomar, V., Bansal, M., & Singh, P. (2023). Metaheuristic algorithms for optimization: A brief review. International Conference on Recent Advances in Science and Engineering, 59(1), 238. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023059238
Wang, L., Cao, Q., Zhang, Z., Mirjalili, S., & Zhao, W. (2022). Artificial rabbits optimization: A new bio-inspired meta-heuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 114, 105082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105082
Wang, W.-C., Tian, W.-C., Xu, D.-M., & Zang, H.-F. (2024). Arctic puffin optimization: A bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering design optimization. Advances in Engineering Software, 195, 103694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2024.103694
Yang, X.-S. (2010). Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimisation. International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation, 2(2), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIC.2010.032124