Thanh bên bài viết

PDF
Ngày xuất bản: 10/04/2024
Ngày xuất bản Online: 10/04/2024
Số lượt xem tóm tắt: 197
Số lượt xem PDF: 139
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52714/dthu.13.3.2024.1254
Số xuất bản
Tập 13 Số 3 (2024): Chuyên san Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn (Tiếng Anh)
Chuyên mục
Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn (Tiếng Anh)
Trích dẫn bài báo
Nguyen, T. T. (2024). RETRACTED ARTICLE: Some cultural pratices in Vietnamese and American weddings. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Đồng Tháp, 13(3), 115-120. https://doi.org/10.52714/dthu.13.3.2024.1254

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Some cultural pratices in Vietnamese and American weddings

Nguyen Thi Tuyet1,
1 Foreign Language Department, Hai Phong University, Vietnam

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

This article investigates the similarities and differences between Vietnamese and American weddings.  Two articles “Vietnamese Weddings: From Marx to Market” by Nguyen and Belk (2012) and “Our Family Functions: Functions of Traditional Weddings for Modern Brides and Postmodern Families” by Barnes (2014) are used to analyze as evidence of traditional weddings in each country because of their detailed records of wedding components. Based on these records of wedding rituals, ceremonies, and practices, the author has highlighted the similarities and differences in the two wedding cultures, which may provide a great contribution to second language learners and teachers to avoid embarrassing cross-cultural situations in life, especially in weddings of these two cultures.

Chi tiết bài viết

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Từ khóa

Ceremonies , cultural rituals, differences, similarities, wedding.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Barnes, M. W. (2014). Our family functions: Functions of traditional weddings for modern brides and postmodern families. Qualitative Sociology Review, 10(2), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.10.2.04.
Bible, H. (1984). New international version. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
Brislin, R. W., & Yoshida, T. (Eds.). (2004). Improving intercultural interactions: Modules for cross-cultural training programs. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Dent, G. W. (2004). Traditional marriage: Still worth defending. Faculty Publications. 194. https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/194.
De Lestapis, S. (1962). Marriage in the Bible. The Furrow, Vol.13, No2, 91-95.
Hernández, T. A. (2010). The relationship among motivation, interaction, and the development of second language oral proficiency in a study‐abroad context. Modern Language Journal, 94(4), 600-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01053.x.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (Third Edition). McGraw Hill Professional.
Nguyen, T-D. T., & Belk, R. (2012). Vietnamese weddings: From Marx to Market. Journal of Macromarketing, No.32, 109-120.
Rook, D. (1985). The ritual dimension of consumer research, Consumer Research, Vol. 12, No. 3, 251-264.
Spradlin, L. K., Parsons, R. D., Director, C., Hugel, R., Director, A., Boes, V., & Giasullo, G. (2008). Diversity matters: Understanding diversity in schools. Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
Westermarck, E. (1936). The future of marriage in Western civilization. Macmilan and Co. Limited.