Management solutions for online teaching and learning securing learner equity
Main Article Content
Abstract
Online education provides greater learning opportunities for all, which is getting more popular and complex as technology grows more advanced. However, it poses a number of obstacles in terms of managing teaching-learning activities securing educational objectives and learner equity. This study examines the distinctive features of online teaching methods, strategies, and tools utilized, as well as barriers that learners encounter in this regard. It emphasizes vital support to students in online learning and properly selects evaluation methods appropriately. Accordingly, the author proposes four management solutions to promote equality and equity in online education, thereby securing educational goals. These solutions include course planning, teacher professional development in online education, boosting course supervision while establishing a support system for student learning, and evaluating the effectiveness of managing students’ assessment in online learning as a whole.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Keywords
Equity in education management, management of teaching and learning activity, online education.
References
Anderson , M., & Perrin, A. (2018). Nearly one-in-five teens can't always finish their homework because of the digital divide. Pew Research Center. Truy cập từ https://internet.psych.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/532-Master/532-UnitPages/Unit-11/Anderson_Pew_2018.pdf.
Alawamleh, M., Al-Twait, L., & Al-Saht, G. (2020). The Effect of Online Learning on Communication between Instructors and Students during Covid-19 Pandemic. Asian Education and Development Studies. DOI: 10.1108/AEDS-06-2020-0131.
Britt, M. (2015). How to Better Engage Online Students with Online Strategies. College Student Journal, 49(3), 399-404.
Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A, P. (2012). Critical Success Factors for E-learning in Developing Countries: A Comparative Analysis between ICT Experts and Faculty. Computer & Education, 58, 843-855.
Banna, J., Grace, L. MF., Stewart, M., & Fialkowski, M. K. (2015). Interaction Matters: Strategies to Promote Engaged Learning in an Online Introductory Nutrition Course. Journal of Online Learn Teach, 11(2), 249-261.
Boling, E. C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H., & Stevens, M. (2012). Cutting the Distance in Distance Education: Perspectives on What Promotes Online Learning Experiences. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 118-126. Doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.006.
Carrier, M. (2017). Automated Speech Recognition (ASR) in English Language Teaching. Training Language and Culture, 1(1), 48-65.
Cucco, B., Gavosto, A., & Romano, B. (2021). How to Fight Again Drop Out and Demotivation Crisis Context: Some Insights and Examples from Italy. In Radical Solutions for Education in a Crisis Context. Springer Publishing.
Cojocariu, V.-M., Lazar, I., Nedeff, V., & Lazar, G. (2014). SWOT analysis of e-learning educational services from the perspective of their beneficiaries. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1999-2003.
EdSurge. (2020). The 3 Biggest Remote Teaching Concerns We Need to Solve Now. Digital Learning Collaborative. Truy xuất từ https://www.digitallearningcollab.com/equity-and-access.
Esteron, M. A. S. (2021). Equity in Online Learning Amidst Pandemic in the Philippines. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 6(5), 139-151.
Food and Agriculture Organization (2021). E-learning Methodologies and Good Practices: A guide for designing and delivering e-learning solutions from the FAO e-learning Academy, second edition. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/i2516e.
Hauck, M. & Kurek, M. (2017). Digital Literacies in Teacher Preparation. Trong In Thorne, S. L., và May, S. (Biên tập). Language, Education and Technology 3rd ed. New York: Springer International Publishing, 275-287.
Hyun, J., Ediger, R., & Lee, D. (2017). Students’ Satisfaction on Their Learning Process in Active Learning and Traditional Classrooms. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 108-118. DOI http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/.
Hattie, J. (2010). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge Publishing.
Kamysbayeva, A., Koryakov, A., Garnova, N., Glushkov, S., & Klimenkova, S. (2021). E-learning Challenge Studying the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(7), 1492-1503. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2021-0257.
Keshavarz, M., Mirmoghtadaie, Z., & Nayyeri, S. (2022). Design and Validation of the Virtual Classroom Management Questionnaire. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 23(2), 120-135. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i2.5774
Lê, Đ. L., & Võ, D. N. (2019). Thiết kế kịch bản sư phạm: Thách thức cần giải quyết trong đào tạo trực tuyến. Tạp chí Khoa học Trường Đại học Sư phạm Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, 16 (12), 947-960.
Leslie, H. J. (2020). Trifecta of Student Engagement: A framework for an online teaching professional development course for faculty in higher education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 13 (2), 149-173. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2018-0024.
Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-Learning, Online learning, and Distance Learning Environments: Are they the same? Internet and Higher Education, 14, 129-135.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (Second edition). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, K. A. (2014). Students Engagement Online: What works and Why? John Wiley & Son Incorporated, ProQuest Ebook Central.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance Education: A Systems View of Online Learning. 3rd Edition. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K (2010). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Center for Technology in Learning: U.S Department of Education..
Mucundanyi, G., & Woodley, X. (2021). Exploring Free Digital Tools in Education. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 17(2), 96-103.
Mazzoli Smith, L., Todd, L., & Laing, K. (2017). Students’ Views on Fairness in Education: The Importance of Relational Justice and Stakes Fairness. Research Papers in Education, 33(3), 336-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1302500.
Milton, M., & Vozzo, L. (2013). Digital Literacy and Digital Pedagogies for Teaching Literacy: Pre-service teachers’ Experience on Teaching Rounds. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 14(1), 72-97.
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement Matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22, 205-222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092.
Nanjundaswamy, C., Baskaran, S., & Leela, M. H. (2021). Digital Pedagogy for Sustainable Learning. International Journal of Education, 9(3), 179-185. DOI:10.34293/education.v9i3.3881.
OECD (2012), Equity and Quality in Education: Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852-en.
OECD. (2020). Trends Shaping Education Spotlight 21. OECD Publishing.
Phan, T. B. L. (2021). Đề xuất quy trình thiết kế dạy học trực tuyến. Tạp chí Khoa học giáo dục Việt Nam, số 42, 7-12.
Rebecca A. G. (2016). Building Rapport to Improve Retention and Success in Online Classes. Journal of Political Science Education, 12(4), 437-456, DOI: 10.1080/15512169.2016.1155994
Sator, A., & Williams, H. (2020). Removing Barriers to Online Learning Through a Teaching and Learning Lens. British Columbia: ABLE Research Consultants.
Schleicher, A. (2014). Equity, Excellence and Inclusiveness in Education: Policy Lessons from Around the World, International Summit on the Teaching Profession, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264214033-en.
Stracke, C. M. (2019). Quality Frameworks and Learning Design for Open Education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.4213.
Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289-306. DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082
Tippawan, M., Sajeewan, P., & Prachyanun, N. (2021). Interactive Tool in Digital Learning Ecosystem for Adaptive Online Learning Performance. Higher Education Studies, 11(3), 70-77. DOI:10.5539/hes.v11n3p70.
Trần, T. H., & Nguyễn, T. K. O. (2020). Các nguyên tắc cơ bản để thiết kế khóa học ở đại học theo mô hình Blended learning hiệu quả. Tạp chí Giáo dục, số 477, 18-22.
The Glossary of Education Reform. (2018). Classroom Management. Truy cập từ https://www.edglossary.org/.
UNESCO. (2020). Adverse Consequences of School Closures (Blog post). Truy cập từ https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse/consequences.
Wagner, N., & Head, M. (2008). Who is responsible for E-Learning Success in Higher Education? A Stakeholders' Analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 26-36.
Yusuf, B. N. (2020). Are we Prepared Enough? A Case Study of Challenges in Online Learning in a Private Higher Learning Institution during the Covid-19 Outbreaks. Advanced Social Science, 7, 205-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.75.8211.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Thanh Huong Tran, Integrating the feminist theory into teaching at higher education, solution to address gender equality in Vietnam , Dong Thap University Journal of Science: Vol. 11 No. 4 (2022): Social Sciences and Humanities Issue (Vietnamese)
- Thanh Huong Tran, Hong Kong higher education administration and lessons for Vietnam higher education development , Dong Thap University Journal of Science: Vol. 10 No. 1 (2021): Social Sciences and Humanities Issue (Vietnamese)